Does not look too bad a price at this moment for this coin, but historically for some recent auctions, you are near the top of what this...
Not just the set registry stuff. There is an appreciation for a business strike that is not only near perfect but has the luster and the great...
Yes. Quite so at times. Conditional rarity.
I have a few with bad scratches.
No problem. But I won't encourage by responding privately. Now you have more info.
No need to PM me with a comment that easily would have fit in better on this post.
[IMG] Need more info. Otherwise what are we expected to say? We don't even know what Lincolns you have or their condition or desirability, etc.
I said MS65. Although the cheek hit is a distraction, I think the coin is relatively clean so that someone felt it should be a 65.
"@alurid nailed the date ,and I'm convinced they are a savant. Lol." No. I got to the party late, but you just have to know the years. I said...
It was minted between 1959 and 1968 It is damaged It can be kept for the copper if you like It is not a SMS or proof It is a business strike
Based on this, I take back my 'baby steps' comment
Since it seems to be offered from Ohio, I think it is super unlikely it is the OP's and strange that the OP got offended at it being not confirmed...
Good eye... It s on ebay https://www.ebay.com/itm/1796-DRAPED-BUST-HALF-DOLLAR-15-STARS-PCGS-VG-DETAILS-REPAIRED-FINE-DETAILS-/113696937666 [IMG]...
A no 'FG' has to have no trace or impression of the initials. Unfortunately, the coin you show does show the FG.
But, on the bright side, I'm not seeing you try to say this is a MS65 coin, so baby steps.
I did not see anyone say this is worth melt. You got comments saying how scarce it is and that people would welcome it in their collection.
MS63RB
I prefer to troll back at him. Lord knows he does give me some opportunities! [ATTACH]
#2
She's a beauty.
Separate names with a comma.
