Seems like it's intended to be pinned to clothes or whatever.
Looking at his other listings he has an 1895-O $1 PCGS MS61 listed as "proof-like" not designated as such. An 1829 5c NGC MS64 listed as "proof",...
@justafarmer I get what you're saying but for it to be a "1901-S", both sides of the coin have to be correct. But yes, the obverse is "correct"...
The TPGs disagree. Heritage sold an 1892 PF63 4/23/2020 for $3480 and says roughly 100 exist for both 1892 and 1893, describing the 1892 as "part...
ITS/CTS? The holder reminds me of ICCS, the Canadian grading service.
Same. Don't rock the infallibility boat over there or bam!
Your poll asks "MS or AU?" but there is no MS option. Just saying.
What do they do with these? Return them to the owner? It's interesting how the RCMR article you sent me focuses on the date placement as the key...
So, the 2022 Morgan is going to commemorate the 100th anniversary of not making them anymore?
My first thought was VF30. But with the wear in BER and looking at Photograde, I guess it's more like a 20. Way too much meat left in the laurel...
Yeah, I don't know where that notion comes from. Most of my valuable coins have never been slabbed. I would expect a lot of stuff similar to the...
I'd prefer they say Cleaned versus Harshly Cleaned. Then there's a couple more categories (at least) - Marked Cleaned But Really Isn't, and Not...
Yes, discussed here https://www.cointalk.com/threads/oldies-from-early-america-sell-in-auction.389707/ Grandpa kept all his coins like this too.
Separate names with a comma.
