I can see both sides of the argument on this one, why don't we add a planchet flaw or some sort of lamination. I think that it is one that needs...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1793 Token GR Brittain, Yorkshire Leeds 1/2 penny Third side says Payable at Brownbill's Silversmith [ATTACH] [ATTACH] i
The coin in question was put between to other cents. Then torqued with a vise. Pmd is Post Mint Damage.
This is a vice job. PMD
The P mm has all ways seemed to get defects like this in later die states. I agree with die chip. I am not aware of any p/d - OMM, Happy hunting.
I agree with the plating blister, Most of the die craks for this year come from the memorial and touch the rim. In your image it does not look...
Could be a cud but, might be a lamination.
It looks like a well circulated cent, all the devices will look fattened.
All Philadelphia issues have no mint mark.
The first third side looks like a bag mark.
I think I was taught that all doubling in this era was Longacre.
17$[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Isn't that Longacre?
More so on the older slabs. Might I add, closer to the true ANA standards.
This one deserved it! going in an old Littleton.
I like the shell look, would that be the first of the pour or the last?
Just waiting on the half off day!
Probably just needed a tear off, Go, Truex Jr. I Was kinda thinking on the lines of "true view" with this GTG.
Separate names with a comma.
