Nice Frankies! Skyman.
Without better pictures, I think that might be a partially filled die, could be some die deterioration. I don't think this qualifys as an error.
I see what looks like some field chatter in front of her face. The cheek and hair and reverse are nice though. I also think that the fields are...
This is exactly why I posted the Buffalo. I couldn't take my eyes of the coin when I saw it in the dealers case. It was surrounded by ms65 to ms68...
Got this for 12.50.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] I have been using one I made, but the Camera is in a fixed position. I hope this will be easier.
That was a great score. Let us know how it goes. I would shop it around the show.
I am at 65. I have been liking this style of grading. Lehigh used it on a different thread. I would grade it. S 64, L 65 E 65 C 65 An easy 65 when...
I like the cents that aren't corroded.
I am on the fence with Pl 64+ todays grading. Still have yet to find an old PCI slab, I don't know their standards.
It just misses the 65 mark. The reverse is real nice in the photos. To many breaks in the lustre to get a 65 on the obverse. MS 64
@Insider "This confirms my theory that people are substituting their own standards for grading this coin rather than applying NGC's standards....
To be on par with the thread, What do you grade this Buffalo[ATTACH] [ATTACH] ?
Agreed, I am sure in the future, there will be few of them though.
This confirms my theory that people are substituting their own standards for grading this coin rather than applying NGC's standards. What you are...
Hang in there. It's not easy seeing them get old.
So, literal. That's not how this Hobby works, google UNC.
Agreed definitely a start, @kookoox10 It is smooth because it was either a pocket piece or, some one polished the contact marks. Your 63D is...
Doggonit!
[MEDIA]
Nope!
Separate names with a comma.
