Sorry folks but those areas that you call coin damage, I believe are raised. Here is a reference By Mike Diamond a member here....
Politically correct? Tpg's don't judge a coin by ethnicity, or gender? or, are you saying sometimes your work is caught and then sometimes not.
http://varietyvista.com/02b%20LC%20RPMs%20Vol%202/RPMs%201969S.htm
It looks raised to me.
This is not so much a query, of what you have, but there are some pretty informed individuals here....
Damage to the die or an attempted canceling?
:rolleyes: I missed that area below the S, good catch. This is a reference that I use. Maybe @Ordinary Fool can post his reference.
I would like to see some photos of the query? The topic is interesting, and I would like to see the process, this is not to steal,, info. but only...
I think it is circulation wear with a little strike doubling.
S 65 L 65 E 66 C 64 I am not sure if this coin quite gets a 65, I think that the contacts are a little too distracting. I am at 64 maybe a plus...
A 50 percent sale, your quite the guy.:rolleyes:
WWho-001 is a doubled working hub obverse, WDDO-002 Thru WDDO-010 are all obverse. These don't fit the OP's question. I did see that Wexler has a...
Yes, it is possible, I think Chris is right. There is also evidence of die deterioration on the date.
Good conclusion, I think it is what Treashunt says, MD or mechanical doubling,. It doesn't look like either Doubled Die posted above.
There are two for the year, which do you think it is? http://varietyvista.com/01b%20LC%20Doubled%20Dies%20Vol%202/1983PDDR001.htm...
13 minutes.
Is it impossible to post a photo lately, that is oriented correctly?
I'd keep em. Nice finds!
It looks like strike doubling.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
