I think I see Die deterioration doubling. Same look as DDD on nickel. Yours is nickel plated steel.
I Think that there is plenty of luster, just thick toning. I see a lot of nicks and dings, on the reverse fields. MS64
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Scratch sucks but I bought it for the RPM.
Here are a couple color toned.[ATTACH] [ATTACH][ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I thought I'd post one that fits this thread well. There are three errors involved with this 55S, all of them are die breaks.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
Hope it's a good one Richard! And nice steel cent.
There are many Shady Pawn shops around, and just a reminder, most of these shops have employees that only know how to look on ebay, for sold...
Not to mention complete and weak strike issues.
I think the correct term would be incused lettering. These would be raised on the die, therefore any minute MD would not be struck away by a...
Sure does, interesting though.
The marks on her cheek could be slightly superficial (very light contact) I agree with the 65 grade. edit I am sure that there are better...
http://www.error-ref.com/ This is a good reference for mint made errors. http://www.error-ref.com/?s=Cud What you have are interior die breaks.
I have been thinking about a scope for this particular reason. Yes, it is raised from the coin, but it is very faint. the only thing that catches...
Right about the Monticello, my bad. Is the damage to insignificant? It is raised from the coin especially, between the E and the rim.
Might have played this one before.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Yes a very well struck example. AU55, Possibly a 58 if there aren't any hairlines.
Look for tooling marks, it's probably a 3 turned into an 8. Edit I just checked VAM world and couldn't find any clashed dies, also It is nearly...
$875
Large
Non of the above are Cuds, they are interior die breaks.
Separate names with a comma.
