This is where you are wrong.
It sure looks like it has some originality to it. It has some spots that say it is AU, I am not sure cabinet friction would apply to this coin.
It may look like it's doubled, but it is form of split plate doubling on the devices.
What's the use, what gave you the idea to recreate something we see day in and day out, and expect a different response? It was never a doubled...
I am in the opinion that if you are gonna photo something, do your best to give a true impression of the coin. If it has flaws show them. I am not...
I bought the mint set for these two. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
@Mr. Waggers One day you will stop looking at your terrible photography, and actually make a decision for yourself, with your own eyes. There...
I am at page two. [IMG]
He, fly's solo, must be a new Fad.
Nice photos Tommy!
See how the MM is doubled in the same direction and looks like all the other doubling on your coin? That would make it MD. All mint marks were...
That is what is called a "retained interior die break". This is from Cuds on coins http://cuds-on-coins.com/ RIDB-1c-1956-02 Images are courtesy...
$165
What you are defining is a clash, a mule is completely different. http://www.error-ref.com/?s=mule
Well as @jtlee321 said below you. It may say 64, but look as good as any 66. Not sure what they were thinking.
Definitely a spender.
I see a damaged quarter.
Way, to get in there at the last minute there @mynamespat :)
By the way, there is some sort of strike thru 2 o clock, from the one in the date, and a few dings in the out stretched arm. Also some evidence of...
There was a new member that guessed this one on the Money. It was @Mike Drop , I am pretty sure that he was playing a little hooky. On his phone,...
Separate names with a comma.
