$145
That coin is an 83' not an 88'. The years for CAM is 92' the years for WAM is 98, 99, 2000. From looking at your photos, this all looks to be...
It's glue, Just PMD.
Could you get a better photo of the area in question? As Furry frog said these zlincolns are known to be very problematic. They are full of...
If it goes PL this could easily have a chance at 64. I have seen worse in 65 PCGS holders.
If you don't have any here is one that I like to use. http://varietyvista.com/index.htm
I wouldn't be worried, that guy was looking to unload on someone. I thought it was perfectly acceptable.
Way to take one for the team! I almost chimed in after you but thought you had that one under control. LOL
It looks like it has a chance. I know that they have changed their standards, so it really depends on how reflective the fields are. The reverse...
I'll bite, you have a 82 small date zinc cent, worth 1 cent. @BooksB4Coins this one only posts to old threads, and gets mad when you don't tell...
Nice photos, and cool looking circam.
Yeah, to bad for the damage. What's the poll and for what amount of time? I have three for the evening.
Hard to tell, could it be a lamination? The area above IN looks weird also. You would need to lessen the light and get us some better photos.
The small date gets it's name because it is actually pretty petite compared to the large, when you find one you won't have to ask.
@lordmarcovan Couldn't @ilmcoins put that below in his signature? As you have your eclectic box of twenty?
Are they raised or recessed?
Here is the reference from Variety Vista, There are plenty of other pick up points for this DDO. Thanks for the correction. @Jasper Burns...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The back ground will definitely effect the white balance on your coin. This color is reflecting back to your lens. If you are using an auto...
That's too bad that you can't get a full pick, It would be worth it. To me anyways.
Separate names with a comma.
