Heck, even the dog or cat would do....
Oh Mark...do tell. You too?
As well you should my young friend. :)
How apt, as I'm now quaffing a Yuengling....
Carefull Dagg. We don't want to get anyone started.....;)
The '42-s quarter could be worth a few buck depending on its condition. The 69-s cent is rather common.
Sounds like mutiny's afoot......:smile Hope you enjoyed your birthday Kid :) And many more of 'em....
Proofs are coins made specifically for collectors. The San Francisco mint has been devoted to that effort for many years now but they haven't...
Frank's right. That glazed over phenomena just doesn't occur here....:smile
Might not be what's makin' it a '69....
How much were they selling the Harrison rolls for? BTW, I enjoyed the read....:)
Because production at the San Francisco mint is mainly devoted (nowadays) to proof production.
I don't quite recall where I read it and danged if I can find it. I think it might have been in numismaster when they were commenting on the big...
Shoot Luis, when did you order it?
Thanks Dagg...puts it in proper perspective. :smile
2005 was the first year...... Don't think we're gonna have one this year.:(
Proof is a method of manufacture and not a condition. I've recieved proofs from the mint that were scratched, but yeah, they should be darn near...
When we say low mintage we are referring to the mintage of the particular product. Overall, mintage figures for proof coins of that year aren't...
Well indeed we do have our resident "alien" here on CT....:whistle:
Separate names with a comma.
