71[ATTACH] [ATTACH] 71D[ATTACH] [ATTACH] 71S PF[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
And you work at a news paper?
The 0 was moved, technically damage but interesting when they are found.
I saved my favorite for last.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] Thanks @Paddy54
The mirroring in the photo says to me it has been reprocessed.
That was a pretty fast CAC gold to boot!:)
There is no way that is better than an 65. This is exactly what chaps my hide. The grade has no merit. And makes them look foolish.
The proofs are misc. 70's to 05' I will be posting them in this thread as they come around....
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Here is a 99P struck about 20% off center, also FS.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Did you use Variety vista, There is 113 rpms for the date and MM. Looking at it I suspect a D/D with a well placed Die chip.
I know that the two sides will never meet, and will never be an easy subject around here. Dan's coins have always had a distinct look and that...
I am not really trying to pick a side. Dan Carr's overstrikes are a fun and great addition to anyones collection. If one actually inspected some...
I want to call it NT the dark hazing on the coin makes me suspiscious. I would call it improper storage, and then say QT.
Nice business strike @Lehigh96 I broke a Pf set for this one. All target toned. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I really wish I could get the color right. Here it is. Any one who said it was a MS66. [ATTACH] Most of Ya'll got the grade. Had to have the RPM...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]I gave this one an acetone bath, had some Verdi-Gris.
I am sure that it would have had full steps if it weren't for the loss of metal.
It's toning, the spots on it, say the toning was induced and not natural. I wouldn't pay a premium for it.
I was gifted some awesome PF nickels recently to help out with my set. These were in the package. I only have one photo'd at this time I will...
Separate names with a comma.
