I went with A. I felt that the surfaces were the best on that one, would have been with C except the luster under the steps seemed to be muted. I...
The coin was damaged the number took a hit. No need to send it to Potter. Here is a fun 92D found in circulation.[ATTACH] [ATTACH] , The look of...
Nothing wrong with a 67. The surfaces are pretty nice.
Exactly what I was wondering?
I am having a hard time telling how much luster there is on the coin. Seems to have minor contact marks. But most of the MS grade boils down to...
Business strike or SMS. The SMS is more likely to have FS. But the SMS are not recognised. What is recognised is cameo and DCAM. 5 full steps are...
The bottom one should definitely not make it. The upper one is still questionable on the fifth step. What years are the coins.
You can't try to join a 94' with an 84'. The dies are year specific.
It is a lot more likely that it is Die Deterioration. I can't fully tell from the photos because of the flash and glare. The MM has the same...
There is no doubt that it is a die break. I think that you should look over this site to help you with your terminology. http://cuds-on-coins.com/...
210
Well that didn't work to well. The doubling was evident and something that a die searcher should know.
Look towards the rim.
I love the satiny smooth luster on this one.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Heres it's cousin.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Coin collecting is the atudy of coins. Right? What die state would you say your coin is?
Those just look like well circulated coins. If you look at more coins that are much closer to mint state and even visit some coin shops that have...
Theres probably not many that are as circulated as that one either. Most if the coins are gonna be mint state. If were the OP I would give that...
Hint. They is something very obvious on the obverse of the coin that is a dead give away as to the type of doubling.
85
Separate names with a comma.