Great pics Sam Almost looks like a die chip between bust and star. Found a retained cud in a roll today.
Your right if I get close enough I can twist the two pieces.
Shoot I am still laughing at the dropped bowtie comment.
The photos look great. There is a lot of good info in the thread take a look....
I just found a roll of BU Lincoln wheats I stored away years ago for the same reason bought M.Meghrig & Sons. I see two things though: The freezer...
That's a neat die crack on the obverse.
I thought the same at first and thought that rectangular nails ended somewhere around the 20's but I was wrong also. Rectangular nails stopped in...
Post a photo.
Wow, this is like trying to compare road kill to a side of beef. Not even worth the effort.
Didn't realize that at all. You will have to get better photos of your coin to confirm. @White Ger. Shep. Lover could very well have this one right.
It's a DDO-001 VV
It's an IDB. A clash would be present in the fields.
It's not an error it is Post Mint Damage. Interesting that part of the Monticello is present in the center design.
A 53 would have to be a top pop to be worth the grading fees.
These are linear plating blisters.
If you say so.
That gouge on the reverse 2 somethin and almost 4. Changing my thoughts PMD.
I have never understood this side of the argument, What I have understood lately is that AU has turned into the new 65. What the TPG's are saying...
Yeah the last thing I want to imagine is a guy named Bernie bent over, Thanks for the visual.:hilarious:
[ATTACH] If there was a most desirable Whizzer to add to ones collection it would be an 09SVDB or a 14D no D strong reverse.
Separate names with a comma.