Lol
*2
Wear and tear but also over used and grease filled dies. Still not an error.
If that is not glue. Which it does have the possibility. It is a retained cud. The crack crosses the rim at each end. 3 and 7 o clock
Proof coins are struck twice. Although it does have the look of a DDR.
There is always a possibility. The problem is that the mm does not have any chatacteristics of being as struck. When a coin shows circulation and...
It is damaged PMD. Could be altered, it did not happen at the mint.
A non PVC flip, the consensus is the ink on the paper insert was the most likely culprit.
AU55
I am not sure brand wise. They were from some foriegn coins I bought years ago.
Just adding an update to the coin. You were 100% correct. The coin has not moved since I last posted the coin has only gotten darker. [ATTACH]...
I am not sure if I have posted these before. When I got them years ago they were untoned. I put them in some paper holders and just found them....
Looks close to this one. Not sure because the obverse was polished away. http://www.maddieclashes.com/tdc-1c-1985-01/
Below the memorial is Lincoln's forehead and back of neck, chin and shoulders inside the pillars, their is evidence above the memorial but it is...
What you are seeing is die deterioration doubling (DDD). This was the first year trying to strike new designs on the reverse and die were used...
Their is no doubt that this coin is a very nice looking coin. I never doubted AU. The coin clearly shows not only high point luster loss AU58. But...
I know you didn't and I can see how you thought that I pointed the statement towards you. I thoroughly agree that this should never see a slider...
Or there is something we are not seeing in the photos. That much luster loss should no way ever be a slider.
Both eyes are circulation damage not errors.
Nathan your point is not coming thru. Please explain how a 2007 has anything to do with a 2010.
Separate names with a comma.
