I went 65. The fingerprint takes away from the luster in my opinion.
I am not disagreeing with you. but for 27$ it was hard to pass up. I am more interested in stopping the corrosion.
Out side is fine, stay upwind if you can. Acetone will dissipate (easy to dispose of) so if you have something to cover it with you are better off.
I will give this about an hour. That corrosion needs to be removed. I will do, my thinking of hot distilled water is to remove some of the dirt...
I am thinking of changing my grade on this one the fields are mirror like, and the devices seem to have some frost/texture. I am leaning to Cameo.
I came across this in an antique store today. As you can see below the reverse has a green (pvc) and pink (?) corrosion on the reverse. What...
Nice, I am also seeing a PF67
Guess the grade and the slab. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
That is die deterioration.
Sorry, but I don't see it either. The doubling is flat like as said above. I don't see the notching on the devices either.
These photos are useless. They are blurry, and too small.
Here is mine a centered broadstrike. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
+1
Cool wide second punch on the 9. This has got to be a PF65 or better. Nice one Jags.
Now, how do these turn so much in a four finger holder. I can see the old rattlers, But NGC should re holder that for free.
Well you can't prove something that is impossible. It's an expensive education. At least it's not my money.
I do agree, that the obverse is amazing. We are just gonna have to wait and see what grade it comes back. Hopefully the photos are just over...
I am at MS66. Star? Even with the dark area upper rim reverse?
Separate names with a comma.
