[ATTACH]
Better detail in the re-shoot.
I am by no means an expert, but this coin looks wrong to me too. It is way to soft in appearance and I see what appears to like casting bubbles...
The Septimius Severus is harder to attribute since much of the legend is missing on the obverse. I believe it would attribute as one of two...
The Constantine II is attributed as RIC VII Antioch 73. RIC lists it as an R1 (rare, but not extemely so). Once again RIC's rarity tables are...
The Constantine II is a solid, well detailed coin, but I think it is a common enough coin. The SS denarius is rather rough, but it too is nice...
Good pick up Gil. Nice and large. [ATTACH] DOMITIAN AE As OBVERSE: IMP CAES DOMIT AVG GERM COS XI CENS POT P P, laureate head right, aegis at...
Just out of curiosity, does anyone else see an image in the small brown circle on the reverse of my coin. Maybe is like the Rorschach test.
Mikey: Love the reverse on the Marti coin. Excellent detail on the shield.
What's next Z?
Love the reverse type. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
[ATTACH] Another photo re-shoot:
Heck, I may as well show my lone example again: [ATTACH]
Nice!
OK, I have tried several times to re-take the photo of this coin and most turn out slightly blurry and I do not know why. Regardless, here it is...
Love turtle coins. Nice and chunky, eh?
Wonderful coin. Gorgeous! Stupendous!! And whatever other adjective applies?
Heyyyyy.....
The pertinent part of that is "a few years ago". I don't think I've sold a coin since. Anyways, JA and I have decided to offer to our fellow...
Separate names with a comma.
