All damage, the rims are raised from hammering around the edge. This also reduced the diameter.
Damaged and cleaned, not high grade. I see no sign of it being a doubled die either. Always nice to find wheat cents though.
Just damage, it looks as though it was soldered to something.
No, just normal cents.
Perfectly normal 1982 D small date zinc, it is the copper one that is valuable.
If any coin dealer thought that is genuine then they are not very knowledgeable. It is a fake, and not even a good one.
Damaged, I would say. Either heat or pounded with something.
It's a fake and not a very good one. Letters are misshapen and uneven, surfaces just aren't right. Some of these can be deceptive but not this one.
Agreed with NLL, very harshly cleaned. Only would have been worth a few cents before, but if it had been valuable the cleaning would have really...
You are correct!
That is not 5.7 it is 5.07, big difference. 5.07 is perfectly normal.
Somebody really gouged that one.
Looks like there is some kind of bezel on it.
Does look like an Indian head cent. You can see the point of the bust above the date.
A "cull" is a damaged or heavily worn coin that is sometimes used as a space filler until a better one comes along. I would say these coins are...
I see some damage, can you point out where you see the error?
Looks like it took a hit on the D, smooshing it.
Looks like you have a copy of a New England shilling. A picture of the obverse will tell which type, but most likely a pine tree. Check the edge...
This is clearly a large date. The 2 is damaged, but look at the distance from the 2 to the rim. The large date is much closer to the rim.
Separate names with a comma.
