The 2006 is just worn down, probably intentionally. The 2013 has been damaged by heat causing the layers to bubble and separate.
Sorry to say it is just damaged, it looks like another coin was hammered or squeezed into it. Welcome to the forum though.
They must have seen a problem, pvc, some crud or something that they thought could be fixed.
I think you better just send the coin in, we're not getting anywhere here.
Take your own advice, buy some guides on coins or send it in to one of the third party graders.
What they are saying is that an overdate would be over an earlier date, not a later one.
Can you imagine if everyone took his advice and sent every scratched, bent, gouged, stained, counterstamped, glued, painted, drilled, hit with a...
While it is nice for it's age it would still only be worth face value in my opinion. It would have to be much nicer to warrant any premium.
The only good advice in here is to buy books on whatever area of numismatics you are interested in.
The Etsy listings have no basis in reality whatsoever. Yours is a normal 1969 s cent.
Welcome to the forum. I have to say though I am a bit confused. What do you feel is special about your coin? That is the normal weight for a...
Welcome to the forum. If you can post clear pictures of some of your coins you will surely get some honest answers here. The most likely...
Guaranteed this never happened. When errors are discovered they are destroyed, plain and simple.
I see what you feel is a 4, but it is just a random mark that resembles the top of a 4. It isn't even the same size as the digits in the date.
Yes, you are correct.
Nope, all 1982's are wide AM, could look different due to die state or wear.
Normal cents, they were all wide AM in 1990.
Depends on condition. Average circulated, maybe 50 cents or so.
All 1982 cents are wide AM, close AM dies didn't come into being until 1992. All of your 1982's are large date. I am not seeing any error on the...
Seen quite often 1908 s and 1909 s Indian cents.
Separate names with a comma.
