I guess machine doubling is a type of error coin. [IMG] [IMG]
Never did get a good image of this. [IMG] [IMG] [IMG]
[IMG] [IMG]
Can't get to the bucket images or the website. Can't find any clean images to post. If you have a link to good images, I'll post the coin on CU...
Was the coin ever posted on the PCGS forum?
ACG had a different standard for grading coins. Many new collectors did not understand that. It was not even close to the standards of PCGS or...
So Fred has not gave an opinion on the coin.
Hi redwine. Have you ever ran this coin by Fred Weinberg? It's a special coin and I'm almost sure he would be happy to offer an opinion.
May I ask who gave it a 65?
It's a really cool coin but not even close to being in the same class as the coins listed above. Sorry but, it is what it is. $1200 to $1500 at a...
The lighting used to image the coin make it look like there are breaks in the luster in spots. It looks AU-58. If no luster breaks, MS-63 or 64....
DMPL if I cared about the investment. The best looking coin as a collector.
I'll guess 67 maybe 68.
Thanks coop. Looks like the folds in the drapery between the led and arm are what is showing on the shield.
I'm thinking the OP coin is a seated half. coop, do you have an overlay? Mine never come out looking right.
This one has an interesting date.:D [IMG]
Cool. Have one for a seated half?
Not a good idea. It will melt plastic.
It looks like it matches the elbow to me.
Separate names with a comma.