Same choice I would have made.
Silverclad 40%. Thats a heck of a score.
I can see why you got one, both @Rheingold and @Chris B are awsome.
Thats the one. Heres the reference. https://coppercoins.com/lincoln/diestate.php?date=1936&die_id=1936s1do001&die_state=mds
I would say the coin would grade AU50. Looks good for the D/S.
These are the brassy cents. They are found mostly on 97, 97D, and 98 Lincoln cents. Too much zinc was added to the copper plating giving them a...
I wonder if it has to do with Flat luster. I have heard the term used before. Here is the definition from coinfacts. flat luster A subdued type...
Thanks anyways Mr. Farmer. It would be fun to see, if you get to it.
The 79S is known for having extremely nice looking coins with reflectivity. I think Pl needs to have readable surfaces from 2-4 inches.
Some clearer photos will definitely help. Both of the DDO's are found on VDB examples. If there isn't a VDB then it is circulation wear and tear.
Same doubling as the date. MM were hand punched into the working die before hardening. If you find a coin that has the same type doubling on the...
Looks like a nice MS coin from the photos. The rim toning isn't going to stop it from grading.
The 36S is most likely one of these. http://doubleddie.com/796218.html Coppercoin has a doubled eye DDO.
Looks pretty close to this one. https://www.pcgs.com/coinfacts/coin/1882-5c-rpd-fs-301-012-5/38410
Thats a pretty good size break. Goes from about 7 to 1.
Only if you want to ruin it. Those are all unacceptable methods of restoration.
What was he asking? Gotta love the soap box holders. Nice looking luster and toning.
I concur @ liberty shows that the coin was flattened out. The rim is bulged in the area.
It is most likely a linear plating blister.
Sorry to say that it is damaged. It has been altered in a vise.
Separate names with a comma.
