These Microscopic photos don't help as said above. It is all environmental damage. I did not happen at the mint.
At 12.5 cents on the dollar? No Thanks. The only coins that I send to one of those is from metal detecting.
Yeah, the hands would definitely get washed after the look of that one.
Whats the weight and diameter? Looks like it could be lead.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Where's the sweat shop, Do you even sleep?
Nice Ultra Cameo Weasuluv.
Didn't know that. The main two authors were Fivaz & Stanton. 5th volume ll had Potter contribute, and the 6th Volume l had Ellis as a third.
Great early stage Clash.
They all look broadstruck except the 2013P.
Neat error, err variety, do you have any better photos?
A dime went down nearly .15 ea I was planning on selling some today.
I was just looking over coinfacts. It takes a 67 to make any money on them. There are a few 68's in early years.
Looks like I should hold on to both of my 5th editions. These were 39.95 plus tax when new. Might I add that there weren't many photos of...
These were rife with die deterioration. And like Spark said there weren't many variety's. The only one known is very minor and on the 99.
I haven't ever looked at how they grade these coins, the majority that I have come across are baggy. I am gonna have to take a look.
I agree for a small dollar they have much more character.
So sad. He will definitely be missed, helped inform everyone on the Error forum for years. I am happy to have met him and talk here in CT. I will...
The only etiquette in a coin shop is Buy BYe Buy..
I know the obverse was a flop. These coins have incredible luster and wonderful tones.
Separate names with a comma.
