I always loved the design. I didn't like that it was clad. It was the first year for a clad Comm. half and they stuck with it. If they had stuck...
If I had the coin in my hand I might agree with the grade. From the image I still think it's really close to AU. They were not made on a modern...
One more DDO. [IMG] [IMG]
This is my image of the coin many years ago. [IMG] [IMG]
Todd took that one.
From David Hall at PCGS. "This has actually happened a few times over the years. Assuming the holder is not tampered with/counterfeit (doesn't...
"Just keep an open mind that it is most likely not a large date." Not a large date?
[IMG] [IMG]
No question in my mind. It's the large date.
I don't think they would get a cam.
I love the look of those last two.
I feel the obverse would cause it to come back in a details holder. To me it's not worth the fees.
I agree.
Nice Walker. [IMG] [IMG]
Something with a clash. [IMG] [IMG]
1862 it is. [IMG]
It's a really cool proof.
Have you looked at it?
Help me understand this. It looks like the head is into the design at the rim. Thats the only marker I understand for the 16.
When you plan to sell, have the 14-D and the 09-S VDB graded. They will bring more if folks know they are real. To me the rest are not worth the fees.
Separate names with a comma.
