I have two for this post. A little obscure but fun coins. Too bad the Mckinely got wiped years ago. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
The mint didn't produce that cent. First mint sealed bags are not made up of multi year coins. Second there are raised edges that imply the struck...
Put it into a flip, find it in a few years and use your knowledge to affirm what you wrote, That could easily be a linear plating blister.
That last Photo sure had a lot of Luster in it. Excited to see NGC's grade.
I don't see much offset in the design, not enough to call it a retained cud. Nice rim to rim @meandyou4ever0
I went 65 6FS I also think the carbon spots keep it from 66.
Not seeing anything.
The The first tell is square rims. A proof will easily roll on it third side. A chamfered edge on the outside is not found on proof coins. Second...
Just Pickin Revello, I have never bought from an auction or over the internet. Hopefully your post got plenty of attention.
Way to give us a heads up!
Hey @Barry Murphy I know you are ancients, what is going on?
MM placement is not correct.
Looks closer too this one. 1954-S RPM-002 (varietyvista.com)
I would think that the juiced photos were Heritages.
It could be just get rid of the glare on the high points.
I think that most Horse's would buy the coin and not the plastic.
I think we have a member here that has a struck thru gold cent. I am almost positive I have seen photos.
Closest I got is a Cuba from the Greater Antillies, [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I thought I had a Puerto Rico couldn't find it this morning. No one else has one, huh?
O have never seen tat on any of the TPG's sites, nor ever heard the statement. That just says that they don't even guarantee their grade. It could...
Separate names with a comma.
