Good luck with the QX-5, I have a 3 and enjoy it. Back to the pix: #1= strike doubling, but, more interesting look at the mark below & between...
To all: I would have said the same thing: post mint damage possibly from a coin counter. But-- look at the date, there is no raised metal...
most likely greased die. That said, it is strange that it is so straight!
BY, George, I think he's got it.
huh? worm? on further thought, I believe post mint.
A little light, but nice separation.
sorry, but to my poor eye they all appear to be AT.
yup, read it, and he was crying about the guy who ripped HIM off! Funny.
The obverse looked damaged. But, the reverse?
Interesting, I'd send it in to a real third party grader.
sleepers: Semi-key Barber quarters. Barber dimes: most lower mintage dates/mints, including the 1895 O. Half dollars: many dates, esp: 1904S,...
Most of them, except for those melted. [Just another meaningless statement. Brought to you my yours truly. Bows to the audience.]
collect89: I MEANT to say that it was conserved. really! REALLY! Okay, I'm lying. But, I like it better now.
Ya really done good! A great buy.
wtc: Hey, I'm on Long Island, perhaps we could go detecting?
Frank: Actually, I believe it to be a contemporary fake. I have a sister to that piece, in the form of a Seated Quarter. they are very...
I'd go for the NGC piece. Okay, the contest is over. What are the grades? I'll bet that the PCGS is graded higher.
GOLD 12/01/2008 774.60 -42.50 -5.21% SILVER 12/01/2008 9.36 -0.98 -9.55% PLATINUM 12/01/2008 807.00 -71.00...
Looks like nice reverse clash marks. Also, check Breen, the position of the arrows is unusual, could be a nice variety.
I agree, not the result of a 'fall'. And, I agree, very interesting. I'd love to examine it, and have to check mine.
Separate names with a comma.
