Jim Nice find! So, how many do you have now? Are you working on the BHNC?
Richard: Thanks, I forgot the date. Frank :thumb:
Okay, 100% guarantee that it is not real. Or, to be nice? 99.99999999999999999999% chance that it ain't the real thing. sorry.
What Richard said. Most like from the plating gone bad, or possibly strike doubling. But, without better pictures, we'll never know....
yeah, and someday they MAY actually wake up.
I don't know, that looks like PVC on the reverse. look at the U of UNUM and to the left of the P mintmark. Or, perhaps I do need new glasses.
wow, you missed a good one. anyone have a link for him to read?
Carlos: Those are commonly called... scratches.
Ruben: Are you talking about the big grin? You can do it when you start a thread.
Many of you have been looking for a copy of Breen's encyclopedia. There is one on eBay right now, current bid is $3.01. Good luck....
Carlos: No. (short & sweet.)
nice Morgan, nice toning.
I believe that you lost Ruben with the "bacon".
welcome to the forum. And it would really help if you could post a picture. Also, look for a mintmark on the obverse (heads) side. It...
Kanga: Nice, I really like those 'crustie busties'. Frank
Carols: No, not repunched. Machine/mechanical doubling is damage to the coin during the striking. No value.
well, as you know they are not listed in Flynn's 'Authorative Reference'. And they are not listed in Lawrence. Nice finds.
Looking at the raised area around the hole, I'd have to say: Post Mint.
red.
Good Move! Love that series. Just don't bother to try to do it in VF, or you will take a l-o-n-g time to complete. (Even for the more...
Separate names with a comma.
