OK, but why ? I mean, you mentioned my first post on page 1, and that was in reference to this coin - [IMG] And the difference between that,...
The coin you've pictured is one of Charles II, not Charles III. So I don't know what you'be been looking up but that may be part of the problem -...
No. I think the coin is gorgeous, the toning completely natural. Though that's not to say it cannot be replicated by those who know how. And the...
OK, so guess, and then we'll see just how close you are ;)
50 is a bit of an exaggeration, but I think you're referring to the Adams coin which was graded 45 in '89, then upgraded a few times until '01...
Small answer, basically none. Now wouldn't that be a novel and good thing ! :) edit - and ya know what ? Why it would even be a good thing for...
Well thanks for answering. You have both confirmed what I was pretty sure I already knew - that neither one of you have, follow, or use any actual...
It also might be interesting Kurt if you'd answer some of my questions to you. Like exactly where do you get the grading standards you use ? And...
Kurt I have never, ever, denied that grading standards have changed from time to time. I've owned just about every grading book there ever was...
Ya know, I could go along with grading standards changing once in a while. As long as once in a while isn't defined as every year or two. And as...
It's best to use English Pandapaule - Yes, it's mine. Why do you ask? Thanks to all for the good advice. I will listen to them and look for...
It isn't often that something that catches my eye actually makes me go looking. But when I saw this I said what, Nuevo Reinos ?, I've never heard...
You're welcome and no apology necessary ;)
Separate names with a comma.
