LOL. Nah, not that bad. :)
It kills me to say it, but: I agree with Doug. AU-53, but, hard to determine the luster, could be higher.
How are they cleaned? Generally: Poorly.
hopefully no more than a $1.
I would agree: fake. or a copy (to be polite). (sighs audibly)... only Ruben....
I don't know. There is some weakness to the digits to the date, flatness to the surface (no satin finish, or mirror surface.) Also, there is...
and, who won?
I have to agree, but I am far from an expert on early modern proofs. Also, look at the OD of GOD, is that strike doubling? Interesting.
all that I can say is: Yes, I am all three.
I don't believe this is a biggie. But, are you sure that they aren't the Presidential $'s?
Thanks for the contest. Frank
Side note: On the 1897 S quarters the S placement as show is normal. However, there is a scarce variety with the MM centered under the eagle's...
Carl: You are ahead of me, the only thing my relatives ever gave me was heartburn.
green is gunk, and there is also a scratch across the center of the E. or perhaps not?
Interesting question: 1) "Rare Coins" by Von Bergen (1880's to 1890's) 2) Then the 55 year (approximately) run of THE STAR RARE COIN...
Thanks all.
bigbobh Little chance of seeing a MM there. I had a better one that I thought was good. Sent it to ANACS, and now I have the world's...
Let the games begin! I'll give it a stab. Thanks
# of coins X .25 = Fair value. (had to say that.) You knew it was coming.
Allen: Good find, but you can't think about where it came from, or you'll go nuts. Clembo: At a recent show, I picked up: 2- 1915 S...
Separate names with a comma.
