I kinda like the $1/4. as for the $1/2: punt. You already know that the 1833 is polished, and destroyed. The 1828 has a start of a hole in...
beautiful. Enough said. But, why didn't that $1/2 cameo?
Carl: Where is that? I'd love to go, but I am sure that it is too far. Next time, see if he has any signed Yeoman books, pretty please?
Circs And ya know that I like those Barbers:
Circs Here is one, sorry but it is a circ.
Larry: I will presume that you realize the variety. So, I'll just say: Nice, and I hope that you cherry picked it. :thumb:
I can't believe that Numismatic News made such a silly error (or variety? -- J/K).
agreed.
Silver: Thanks for the pictures, I have never seen those before. :thumb:
you may bore the family with this stuff, but..... That is why we are here, to share & enjoy.
silverSurfer I have never seen $20 rolls of $1/2 before. Are you sure that they wern't $10 rolls? Or they must have been pretty big.
all that I can say is: :thumb:
Carlos; There ain't no way that is a die clash on the CA of AMERICA. A dig into the coin is a better description.
the shiny sports are where the frosting is wearing off from production. If oyu look at early proofs, eventually the cameo effect is completely...
oops, sorry, missed that! Welcome to the gang!
I believe that it is becuase it is deemed no more than a greased die. It still sells for a lot of $, but it is generally not worth the money....
I have to agree with Lost Dutchman. Possibly a result of the plating.
Kirk: Nice RPD. And that is the popular one. However, with that damage, the value is open to negotiation.
Not a DDO. The 'doubling' that you see is the movement of the plating (copper) as the coin was struck.
"Am I Missing something here? " Yeah, the other $1,549.94 in coins. Otherwise, the $10 in shipping for #6 cents, that will cost $.42 to ship.
Separate names with a comma.