[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This arrived the same day as the 1899 I posted above. Dang, it's just a wonderful thing to look at. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Very nice... I only have this old red one. [ATTACH]
Full image is on top, and animated (but color-compressed) is on the bottom. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1973-S Proof [ATTACH] 1974-S Proof [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
MS66 in an OGH. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I did not see the crack until you pointed it out. Here's a full-size crop. I see that it also extends upward at the left and sneakily...
This Monroe commemorative doesn't have a lot of inherent contrast, so sometimes the subtle design can be hard to appreciate. The blue and brown...
I solved the problem. By accident. I put in bids on a couple of 1940 proofs at the same time in different auctions. (That Demon Bourbon...) The...
At 49.99, this barely makes it onto this thread. I don't see any significant flaws with this one, and I really like the purple elevation toning on...
I could use some opinions on what to do. I just got this 1940 Lincoln proof. It's got this old green label. (Really, it's green!) [ATTACH] But...
Wonderful Wild Card! But I just got this in the mail a few hours ago, so I'm returning to the mid-1930's commemoratives. I'm originally from the...
[ATTACH]
This proof [ATTACH] has now been replaced with this one. Cost, about $1.50. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This is a 2001 Proof strike that should, in theory, be the best coin that can be made, with specially prepared dies, polished planchets, and...
Wouldn’t that mean we have to re-evaluate all the mint reports back through 1909? In the meantime I’ll try to corner the market on all high-end...
This is not a perfect 1972-S proof. There are, however, some interesting toning effects. The reverse is almost uniformly toned with a layer of...
I gave up and ordered a new 1969-S proof to replace the one in my last post. I'll show it off when I get it. It was only a couple of bucks, so I...
Separate names with a comma.
