Well, I've only had the Dansco two weeks, so I haven't noticed anything yet! All my other coins are in plastic 2x2's in trays. I like the trays...
Wonderful half! Here’s a vendor photo followed by my take on it. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1941-D [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1941 [ATTACH] Edit: I wasn't happy with this morning's photos. Here are new ones. I left the still image, above, for comparison. The photo of...
I agree. It’s too bad I don’t know who it was, so I could tell them the set is appreciated in its new home. I’m more a custodian of the set than...
Here are a few shots of the coins in the Dansco. [ATTACH] The natural color variation makes an attractive presentation. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]...
1940-S [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I will try to take some pictures of the Dansco. I have some, but the lighting is uneven. I need to remove the plastic slides to get rid of...
The set has a nice consistent look across the pieces and seems a uniform grade range. They are all raw, and the kind of high end, lower cost...
1940-D [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
1940 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
If you liked that one, then you should like this one. Still photos have to choose whether to show proofs with dark fields or bright ones. Rarely...
1986-S Proof [ATTACH]
Thanks. They get even better, so I appreciate the work of the original collector. I hope they are photographed brightly enough - the reflections...
According to @Lehigh96 's excellent article, Jefferson Nickels Reverse of 38 vs Reverse of 40, I judge the three 1939's I posted to be 1939 REV OF...
1939-D [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Gonna have to ask the group on that one. I read the descriptions and looked at pictures. The Reverse of ‘40 should be sharper in the portico and...
Three small changes can vastly improve your posts. The image, by the way, is pretty good. These ideas are just to improve the presentation of the...
I found that I wanted to click on each of the images to see them bigger. So this reaction is in the "Oh boy, I want to see even more!" category;...
1939 [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Separate names with a comma.
