I really like your 1933-P! There’s a certain similarity here. [ATTACH]
I am going to disagree with about everyone. Taking your own pictures is going to be the best teacher about understanding other people’s pictures....
Thanks for your comments. There are times I am looking at something toned and I don’t know how to correlate it to the price guides. As you say,...
[ATTACH]
I am one step closer to completing the 1880's decade with the arrival of this 1880 IHC. I just need the two 1886 varieties to wrap it up. Luster...
I don’t know if anyone can tell more from this, but I cropped and straightened from the original photo. Remember that this 1877 is also marked as...
I counted 20 coins that are marked as proofs, including this one. [ATTACH] @canudigit, when you get more pictures, please use the "Full Image"...
I feel somewhat contrarian here, but in your very nice pictures I see no doubling, much less tripling. All I see is a reflection of the lighting...
This 1911 came in the same package as the 1909 I just posted. [ATTACH]
I swished the coin around in distilled water, and there was no change that I could see. Then I used some acetone, then distilled water, and then...
I have to also post this proof to show how the 1882 shield nickel proofs both have the same shiny mark under the first 8 in the date. They have...
I love the Tombac nickel. Here’s another one. I bought it for the reverse, so the fingerprint is not that much of an issue to me. [ATTACH]
This just arrived. I think I’ll give it a swish in some distilled water, acetone, and then xylene to see if it removes the slightly dirty look in...
This was one of my first photos, by the looks of it. Maybe I should take it over. [ATTACH] Edit: I did just take it over. I kept it a little...
Separate names with a comma.
