Not sticky
Opinions please:pompous: Environmental damage or could this have happened at the mint? It is as if a layer is coming off the obverse of the coin....
The date is doubled, I'm not sure of any of the lettering yet[ATTACH] [ATTACH][ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I have looked for what this is in the references I received through coin talk post, I'm unsuccessful. Please tell me the name of the marks. The...
I don't get why this is not considered an error, seeing how it happens at the mint, but like I stated already, I still have alot to learn
I still have so much to learn. I really do appreciate you guys showing me the correct things I should be looking at. Thanks a bunch:smug:
Ok. I think I see what you are saying. I've been refererencing with the links I bookmarked from one of my last post but I ran across this article...
https://markedmoney.tech/1996-p-washington-quarter-error-doubling-behind-the-ear-more/
And the R and T in LIBERTY
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] In the word LIBERTY If I'm wrong please correct me. Why is the obverse bright shiny and the reverse dull with...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Ok, so I'm still not clear on the answer. Seems that half say it's not good idea and other half say use the mixture. I think what I will do is use...
:joyful:
How do I remove the gunk if not to rub the coin?
Oh, that's not good.
Reference @Collecting Nut please
I cant find a reference to this
I bookmarked them. I have found a lot of information. I like the Wexler page a lot. Thank you for sharing @Clawcoins
Could this be considered AU
I thought so as well. Very nice for the many years in circulation.
Separate names with a comma.
