How about now?
Larry, yours just has to be a proof. I just have this one, which I really like. [ATTACH]
I posted dimes when I should not have, replaced them with nickels, and now we have come around to Mercury dimes again! [ATTACH] [ATTACH] This is...
I realized my mistake and pulled the 1942 Mercuries and replaced them with the nickels above. Yes, I really liked the dimes. Maybe I’ll post them...
[ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This is not a new acquisition any more, but what a perfect opportunity to post another 1921 overstrike from Dan Carr. [ATTACH]
Aw, shucks. :rolleyes:
When I was searching bags of Lincolns back in the mid-1960’s, 1919 was almost common. I probably had a roll of them. Those were part of what I...
I have one from each year except 1916 and 1921. For a few years I have more than one. By no means is it close to a complete set; it isn’t even a...
[ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
No, it’s just a bad light angle, being at the edge of a cell-phone photo. There is a bit of a toning break there under the bow tie, and under...
By the way, lest we hijack the thread too much, congratulations to @dwhiz for the great look to his type set! Keep it up! @Jim Dale - There is...
I hit the Like button about 10 times, but it only registered once. Maybe I’ll just hit it about 10 more times! I mean, Oh My Gawd! The rarity,...
I got the Intercept Shield Type Set album from Wizard Coin Supply instead. It is under $40. The pages are impregnated with chemicals to retard...
A few more 1979 examples. [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I like the proof of the 50’s and early 60’s. [ATTACH]
I am definitely seeing something other than what you guys are seeing. I am seeing perfect surfaces that will catch the light at all angles and...
11500 posts, and no dead end yet…
Duplicate post
Separate names with a comma.
