[ATTACH]
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
I'm a little dizzy following all those jumps across series and decades! [ATTACH]
I don’t think of a year set as a type set, as specified in the title, so here it is, cause why not?! [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
@Evan8 that reminds me of one of mine. I think this one is amazingly nice, so that means I think yours is too. [ATTACH]
Both my newest acquisition and appropriate for this post. [ATTACH] Full resolution photos.[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
This one is an ANACS MS64 RB, if that helps. Sorry it's such a dark coin, but that's just the coin I have. [ATTACH] I can't believe @johnmilton...
For comparison, see the mirror-like finish on the proof. It is apparent even though some toning has started on the surface. [ATTACH] Compared...
There aren't many years with two different proofs. Silver is a lot easier to strike than nickel. Check out the railings along the roof in each...
Oh!
Yet, what a coin! MS67
So, in brief, I could have guessed almost anything and still have matched one of the TPG grades. It's a wonderful coin so we can all enjoy it for...
@Pickin and Grinin that's a beautiful coin. I have one but no toning. [ATTACH] On the other hand, this is a year with a beautiful proof. [ATTACH]
There's nothing wrong with deferring some of the excitement for another day!
Still, I would love to have the excitement of rediscovering what's in this treasure box. If you felt overloaded, everyone on CoinTalk would help...
Very nice. Mine has just a little spotting which yours is free of. Yours looks just as nice if not nicer than this. Frankly, I'm surprised yours...
I went to check the value on NGC Coin Explorer, and noticed on the plate coin photo that the first three digits are weak and the last 2 is sharp....
Separate names with a comma.
