The top one's definitely clad. The bottom one is either clad, or toned on the edge; it looks like a 40% coin, but in those years it would've been...
I'm flattered by the attention and all, but when are you going to address the allegations that you stiffed @Garlicus on the silver he paid you...
On the other hand, this same argument held in 2011, when gold blew through $1700/oz and kept rising. You could've flipped it a month later for...
You're confusing "bully who snaps" with "knowledgeable person whose tolerance for misinformation is not unlimited".
And even that's all about the revenue any more, it seems.
Not to be a dream-killer or anything, but you'll do much better for yourself right now if you put your time and attention toward finding another...
Whoa, a "no mint mark" circulation find that's actually a find...?!
Same way they can get you if you try to pay for goods or services with gold or silver coins at face value. It seems logical that spending...
There's a movement for more states to charge sales tax on Internet purchases in general, but I think the movement on bullion is in the opposite...
Really, really worn! Is that some die transfer I see, too?
I once got a 1oz AGE from an eBay seller in a plain envelope, or maybe it was a bubble mailer -- but it was sent first-class, with no insurance or...
It definitely appears silver, and that weight is within tolerance, I think.
The difference is that a Slinky Dog actually has a direct physical connection between its ends!
It's a recipe for a smaller and lamer company trying to ride the coattails of a well-known company and maybe draw off a few clueless shoppers....
[ATTACH] You're looking at a different PCGS Price Guide from the rest of us...
Huh. Suckers have websites, too. :rolleyes:
You've been hanging out with "goldcollector" too long. A 10% increase is a 10% increase, whether it's from 10 cents to 11 cents or $10000 to...
Yeah, I've had a teller try to troll me, too. :rolleyes:
"Spot"? Sucker. It says "ONE DIME" right there on the coin. Why would anyone pay more?
Interesting. I honestly don't know whether that might be what's happening, but the test is supposed to be validated against a "normal population"...
Separate names with a comma.