Ahh, come on. You can see your grandson any time...how often do you get a chance to see me?;) :p
I'll be at the Indian Nations show in McAlester. Nice show...small, but good selection.
It is.
Why is it any more idiotic to fish for a sucker than it is to be the sucker who snaps up the bait?
What,,,you mean the people who search these sites?
I've found that a pair of vice grips does the job regardless of how caked on the residue is.
1815, 1807, and then (to a lesser extent) 1820 are the key years...however, all dates are readily available if one has the cash.
Well, I've been specializing in them since 1970 so I think that they are OK.;) [IMG] [IMG]
In this (actually, most of the time) case you can definitely speak for me...[ATTACH]
2 questions... Why did you like the coins before before someone told you that they were cleaned? What about the coins themselves has changed...
Why would it matter? Once I decide that the coin is going to be mine it is not going to be in the slab--scratched or pristine--any longer than it...
and the most beautiful woman in the early United States... Ann Willing Bingham [IMG] [IMG]
Reminds me of what is probably the only 1828 half dime in existence. [IMG]
It is 112. Although I do like the 1811 I'm going to disagree with Physics-fan on the other two he posted...I actually prefer the OP's 1819 over...
550.00 A premium over most die marriages but not as much as most R-5s. Most Overton collectors don't collect by die state--only by marriage....
Not a bad coin at all. Good seller, too. If you can get it for under 200 I would say its a buyer.
Yes, there is at least one person on this forum who would turn down owning it even if I should win the lottery and be able to afford it.
115 appears to be right.
I don't personally believe this had anything to do with his termination, but for all you conspiracy theorists out there here is an interesting...
Double post again
Separate names with a comma.
