Yes I am not following. Was asking about the S mintmark in the original post.
Coin Star has been dry lately. Today $1.21 [ATTACH]
OK that S is the blob one. In the very first photo it looked more defined. Maybe the angle.
At a glance it looks like the good S though. Closer photo of the S please.
Nice that they are consecutive and they seem crisp. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
These are all modern coins, tons were produced. They are not worth much more than 1 cent each. If one of these was in spectacular condition, it...
I think it's the obverse that is blank.
I like the 55-S. Low mintage, last S until 1968. Many seem to be in great condition. I am at 75 cents on this, uncleaned. In mid MS $2 is right....
With 8 numbers there are always going to be numbers that look good, or are "close". Try posting this one (photo) in the "ALMOST" thread in the...
Never heard this term. Usually it is X x face, 14x face, 13x face. $1.40 for a dime, 1.30 etc. To find the spot price all you have to do is pop...
.10 cent coin in a $30 holder. Now you're talking my language.
ErolGarip Why don't you add up all the listed/known/published mintages from 1959- present for the Lincoln Cent, and then read my post again.
I'm not saying 3.29 is a valuable error, what I am saying it is outside tolerance.
I think grading is warranted on an 1899 in this condition. It should grade in the 60's unless some flaws are hidden in the photo. The value in...
We have been through this a few times. Fred Weinberg posted the copper Lincoln cent tolerance at 2 grains. ( 2.98-3.24) 3.29 is over that tolerance.
This was interesting: [ATTACH]
Looks pretty crisp to me. Excellent. Ink has great color on both sides. A show piece note.
[ATTACH]
There are no mint marks on US coins 1965 1966 and 1967. The 1939 isn't even worth a dime because it is destroyed and a common coin with a high...
Separate names with a comma.
