I like the coins. But I am going to guess that 1952-S dime is not MS-70.
That appears to be from a harsh scrubbing.
Top one is the Web Note. Bottom one is regular. [ATTACH]
It's not double headed. Whatever. Post 10 shows 2 photos of the same obverse. Post 12 shows the reverse. I enjoyed your rant though.
They are locking up all my spots. :( [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Lincoln has been on about a trillion cents. So if it's not him, it's going to have to really be something extraordinary. (Less than 100M Pres...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_notes
I doubt that coin is genuine. The date is wrong. The 7 and 9 are off. The leaf above the date is wrong. The color is pretty much impossible.[ATTACH]
Plating would not increase the weight by 2 grams. There is a suspicious seam on one of the edges. Even if this was an off metal, if the size was...
It's supposed to weigh 9.4.
So they prefer under graded coins? With the over graded coins you can put them on "sale" and the customer may feel he is getting a deal. In this...
Wrong metal would be significant. Maybe it was plated or coated.
If they are gold colored, they may have been plated which reduces the value.
Would the third print be lined up correctly, if the cut was correct?
Well, but I'm not going to spend them. They are worth minus 7 cents.
While the footprint is an iconic symbol, for a coin design it's lazy.
I think the test was that it cost $14.
The 1982's are very common. Unless it is brand spanking new, MS (mint state) it's generally only going to be .01 cent no matter which one of the 7...
I also thought spooner. Earlier in the thread (7 years ago) they were all saying dryer coin. But those have mushy details both sides and no raised...
1982-Denver small date copper. 1 exists. Yours is from Philly. Yours is zinc. Yours is large date.
Separate names with a comma.
