It looks real to me, looks like a former jewelry piece (the hole). There are many fakes these days. I was just quoting a price for a real one.
I didn't know, because if they were restrikes with the same dies, I didn't know how they could tell them apart (besides provenance). Thanks for...
I think the composition of the war nickels led to more frequent planchet errors, and laminations. IDK what this is, but I think it's a keeper.
Paddy, I think they are supposed to be destroyed. Is the management of the US Mint behaving in misconduct?
Looks like 1801. Are you sure it is a 3? The condition is at the bottom of the scale and it has been cleaned.
If it's real the hole detracts from the value. I'll go $30. Without the hole almost $100.
I have trouble figuring out if it is the C or not, which is rarer and more desirable because it is so subtle. Someone posted what a better marker...
The cleaning was hidden by deceptive photography.
On the 1852 Proof, how do you know if it is original, or 1st restrike, or 2nd restrike? Is that the B-1 designation? And what would the markers...
Awesome.
These types of errors, can't be released by the mint? So how do they end up in private hands? In a mint bag? But there still has to be some...
I use silk fabric to handle the coins to put in and out of albums to avoid fingerprints.
I agree it looks like a photo from a magazine photo.
The 1923 is worn and cleaned.
1964-D has a valuable C reverse variety [ATTACH]
I don't even know what I am looking at.
Fantastic coins.
Not including errors which are rare, the only cent from the 70's is the 1970-S small date. I've never found one in 48 years. With cents besides...
Mis aligned die strike (if the reverse is normal.) If the reverse was also off, then it is off center and worth a little more. While it is an...
I just thought cause the reverse is printed first, it might not look like that. Love to see a photo of the back.
Separate names with a comma.
