Some of the Hennings don't have the loop on the R in Pluribus. Yes Ken is right, weighing it would help a lot.
Do need a clearer shot over the dome. In case it's just very worn. But 1944 could be a Henning which would be a valuable counterfeit.
35% silver. Photo would help. Counterfeit nickel could be in the $50 range.
Crisp uncirculated bills Star notes Errors Fancy serial numbers Old red seals It's true you have some from 1976 when they resumed making these...
There is a curl on the 9, the 7 is high and Liberty is weak. But these are all borderline markers on this coin.
Not my coin. I see the tail on yours. I just couldn't tell cause of the grime and photo if it has that barb, or if it might wash off.
Is it spikey enough? [ATTACH]
During the holidays, you get different postal people, new postal people, or just an address mix up. Someone nearby may have received it and hasn't...
Yes both large. The 1977-D you'll have to orient correctly. I don't think there's a variety for that year. But you can check the Lincoln Cent...
I don't think there even is an S over D 1968 Lincoln. Here is a list from the LCR and some interesting text below. 1944 d/s omm 11944 d/s omm...
Looks like a 1937-D which normally would be worth a little more than just the silver. But it's so worn.
If it was a foreign silver planchet it wouldn't be the exact size of a US cent. It would be larger or smaller or thinner or thicker. And the...
3810
It's nothing.
Isn't it small date over large? If the large was over the small you wouldn't see the small.
Interesting how they think half a billion is low mintage. When I report them to ETSY I tell them, it makes their company look like buffoons when...
OK now I am at 10 cents max, cause it's 1923. This poor coin.
Found this, not worth anything, but I like it. Looks better in hand. [ATTACH]
The 1990-S missing the S, is a proof coin and looks more like this: [ATTACH]
1953-S is a low mintage coin. In circulated condition it's not worth much, but I would save it.
Separate names with a comma.
