Most of the older holders are long gone but I saved several just for fun. Never wanted to stick more money in a low value coin. Please share what...
[ATTACH]
Would it have been OK if Carr had made it?
Here are two more with profile doubling. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Same here. The 82 is damaged.
That was me last year. Had everything booked and had to cancel. I'm thinking about going to the Summer FUN. Not as big but I have never been.
It's profile doubling. It's a bit common on these.
Nice bell lines.
I had a great time and was able to see many old friends. My first show in three years. I only bought two coins but I was happy. It's the O-111....
I will never understand why folks have the need to correct others over petty stuff.
One more with a bit of doubling. [ATTACH]
Pretty coin.
I found this one at the FUN show. 1824 O-111, I believe. [ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Cool piece.
It's an Indian Head Cent. The mint did not make small cents in 1838.
Nice coin. I agree that the toned ring came from some type of holder.
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Wild guess. Maybe a test strike to setup the press for striking lucky holders.
It's tough to judge the luster from the images. Nice coin. I'll guess 64 or 65 if the luster is there.
I love both coins but the matte proof is really nice. Nice color with no spots. Pretty coin. I ran into a few 1916 proofs but non were as clean as...
Separate names with a comma.
