[IMG]
Hey, I resemble that remark.
Another possibility is that they are marks that were in the planchet before striking, that were made when the stock was rolled out.
The weight of 7.6 grams is odd. Significantly less than if it were a 1999 SBA planchet, but also wrong for a dollar planchet punched from quarter...
Added this one to my prime number set at FUN. [IMG]
Hmmm... Buying coins with a mouse in one hand and a drink in the other. What could possibly go wrong? ;)
How about a bottle of Houck's Panacea?
I didn't know him well, but he was always friendly and liked to chat. My condolences to his friends and family.
If they're proof coins, keep them with their original packaging. If they're the uncirculated ones, just keep them safe. There are a few dates...
Study piece for studying fake IHCs? Could also be a practice piece (even if fake) for re-tooling hair detail.
Why not print up some wrappers identical to the one's the seller is using and sell those on eBay? If you craft the title of the auction...
The striations behind the eagle's neck are die polishing marks. While polishing here is quite common with this reverse, the distinct parallel...
I looked at the pictures and it looks authentic to me. The die chip in the lower part of the 2 is a common phenomenon on Morgans of 1882, 1892...
The reverse is an A1d reverse, which means it's either a very common coin (VAMs 6 and 7) or a very rare coin (VAMs 14.5, 14.8, 14.19). Look at...
Separate names with a comma.
