MS 65 FBL ....FBL by PCGS standards...very lustrous but the reverse would make me think it didn't make 66
Looks cool; nice work!
I'll go with a 5 (To me it is a little bit better than the last one you posted which I called a high 4, so this one makes it into the 5 range).
Someone certainly did. I've seen toners sell several times in short time periods (one that I was following has been through three different people...
Someone lost money but my guess would be it was somewhere earlier in the chain of sales. I saw him post it as a new acquisition a few months ago...
@brg5658 you are up... then me... then open...
Summary Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs...
Some people will only buy PCGS toners, so that is part of the reason these get crossed. Also, the person probably thought it had a good chance of...
Maybe @Eduard And hopefully some others will chime in as well.
@brg5658 has the next post after we are done with the Morgan. Then I have one. (Please let me know if anyone else wants in afterwards).
With a lot of O-mint Morgan toners, I've noticed that the luster tends to be subpar. The picture doesn't help us determine anything about the...
Also found this: http://gxseries.com/numis/rus_new_type/soviet_posters.htm "During the mid Soviet eras, perhaps around 1970s, the Soviet-German...
What you have is "мдссср" ("D" not "A") I can't figure out exactly why your example has it but the other does not (maybe a restrike from the...
My best was a set of privately assembled mint sets from 1947-1974. Many had nice quality unc coins. I was able to upgrade many spots in my...
@Treashunt is the go-to person for Red Books as he wrote the reference for them.
Separate names with a comma.
