We can move to the Morgan posted by @Brian Livesey [IMG] [IMG]
Rd. 1: 1921 MS 65 Green CAC Morgan--> Yes: 4 vs No: 3 Rd. 2: 1835 AU 50 Green CAC 50c--> Yes: 2 vs No: 8 Rd. 3: 1939-S Oregon MS 65 Gold CAC...
Looks great! And it's a coin you definitely don't see nicely toned often.
They tried that with the 2012 Silver Eagle Set. Some people were happier but others were disappointed that the mintage was too high. It's not the...
I like it! I'm struggling a bit to interpret the photos (HA image?) but the reverse really stands out. I'm between a 3 and a 4. I'll bump it to a 4.
My newest Morgan arrived today (and it's a date I haven't owned before). What do you think is the grade on this one? Please use the poll as well...
I like the idea. The sample images move too quickly in my opinion. However, when clicking on one from an auction link, the speed is slower. It's...
@dbc99 I've owned a few San Francisco Morgans from the 1880-1882 date range that looked similar. Sometimes the reverse holds it back (just misses...
@Mainebill you are up...
Summary Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7 (Low-Mid) vs...
I agree with @Lehigh96 that the rattler is worth more than a new holder (NGC or PCGS). Plus it helps show that the coin has been stable since the...
John Feigenbaum also runs the greysheet (which covers values for CAC and non-CAC coins and doesn't necessarily benefit from promoting one or the...
That was my thinking as well.
MS 64 PL
Is this it? https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces27509.html 6 Tornesi - Ferdinando IV
[ATTACH] [ATTACH]
Interesting pictorial and quite inexpensive. Nice buy!
MS 62
It's a controversial topic as you can see. :p Part of the issue is that there is no published guide to tell us CAC standards (nor the TPG...
It's hard to say what CAC is thinking since we don't have any definitive published standards. My guess is similar to yours that they tend to go...
Separate names with a comma.
