just did...you're up :)
Summary Chapter 1 Rd. 1: 1883-O Morgan NGC MS63* [Obv]...CT -> 3.6 (Mid) vs You -> 4 (Mid-High) Rd. 2: 1880 Morgan PCGS MS62 [Obv]...CT -> 2.7...
That was actually my thought as well...in my view, the color on the proof pops more (is more vivid)....so my score is similar to your score...... 3.2
Did I just see this happen on CoinTalk? :) [MEDIA]
@brg5658 you are up followed by @SSG_Gonzo and then @Lehigh96
To me it's a toss-up....by the book it likely doesn't make it but by what PCGS has shown as acceptable, it likely does. I voted no but that was...
That's fair; I like it enough to buy at a premium to a generic proof of that date but not a large premium (considering these go from $10-$30 on...
I believe it's on its second or third try (didn't sell before-likely priced too high). I don't see as many toned proof Ikes as I do toned proof...
I still like the coin overall (especially for an album/raw set) but will defer to those that know this series better (it does have the cleaned and...
MS 63
I always love seeing these albums being filled. Nice work! A non-US Dansco has intrigued me but I haven't embarked on that journey yet. All my...
They all look superb! Is the 1852 Royal Mint harder to find or have you just not run into the ideal example for your set yet?
I liked this one a little more than the other one and this my score is slightly higher at 4.5
@Morgandude11 you're next then @brg5658 the @SSG_Gonzo
Hi all, A few items are posted below. Shipping is included in the price unless otherwise stated. Payment via paypal (usually G&S, unless otherwise...
Let's ask the experts. :D @lordmarcovan and @CircCam
I've seen plenty of fancy names for collections. Sometimes it's justified while other times it is not. In this case, it made you look through...
MS-66+ Looks very nice!
Separate names with a comma.
