Gotta go 66, it's very clean even though the luster appears subdued. It could definately be +/-1 depending on how it looks in hand.
The right field hit should keep it out of 67.....looks like some killer luster.
DOH! I just saw the second page, lol. You'd probably get more money in a slab. Collectors can be very fussy about these as the prices vary greatly...
Better pics, just a hair over-exposed but....you can see the luster now. Should be good for MS-64/65 at any TPG. Definately get it slabbed.
100% replated.
It's happened to me as well. I really hate when folks ship rolls using envelopes, I never do. If you do use an envelope to ship ANY coins, you...
Very interesting....thanks for the post!
Cool story and an interesting coin. The design is quite strange, but for some reason I like it.
Large date, pics too small for accurate grading, but it looks to be about 64.
Whoa....look at Doug out there on that limb! LOL
The 1934 is VERY nice. Rinse with acetone and put it in an airtite ASAP to stop it where it's at now.
Whoa....somebody got one heck of a deal on that 65 VDB!!!!
WOW! That's a really cool set!
Nah, it's the right obverse field they didn't like. The fields are very important.
Excellent conservation! Congrats!
Just take out a Sharpie and put a + sign next to the grade, then take a green marker and draw a CAC sticker. ROFL
ok....exactly 10,000 posts! Congrats!
If you don't want to keep it, I'll give you a full refund! :D
COOL! Some light woodgraining! NICE!
Ain't no way that's a 65, I don't think there's a big price jump to 66 or I'd crack and send to PCGS because NGC got this one wrong IMO. Based on...
Separate names with a comma.
