As far as I know, the seller doesn't get to choose the reason for blocking a potential E-Bay bidder/buyer. The seller simply adds the name to the...
It would grade, but get that idea out of your head right now. Your coin simply doesn't have the value to be considered a worthwhile submission....
[IMG]
I think the strike and luster are too weak for MS66; my guess is MS65. I do love the color.
Ya know, there is a mark on the neck on the slab shot that doesn't really show up on your closeup photos. That might be the reason for the MS63...
Agree 100%. The spot bothers me more than the fingerprint, it is just in such a bad place.
Bought a small collection of raw Jefferson recently and am going to keep this 1965 SMS for myself. [IMG]
Ok which slab photo is better? Left or Right? Please vote in the attached poll, thanks! [IMG] As always, comments welcome.
Bravo Tom, this thread is TOTW, for all you Cointalkers who have been around for a while.
That is ridiculous! They punched the wrong date on that coin. It is supposed to be a 58-D!
A blue wing and a lavender wing, dripping with luster. Way too cool!
OMG WOW! Holy Cow! I think the 1940 is the cream of the crop! That said, they are all fantastic.
I agree, MS65
That is correct sir.
I'm not worried about the coins, they are circulated stuff with no real numismatic value. This holder is different than most Capital Plastic...
9.5 x 11.5
I remembered buying a collection a few years back that was in a holder. At the time, I was only interested in the coins. Good thing I didn't...
I decided that I needed to increase my knowledge of circulated Jefferson Nickels so I started a circulated Jefferson collection. But I didn't...
OK, they don't look like luster grazes anymore, I'm back at MS63.
Separate names with a comma.
