That's the same conclusion I reached. Some of the detail is too worn from what I can see on your pictures but my best guess is the 1853-today...
@Lehigh96 that makes more sense now. Those are some nice Denver Mint toners!
Most of the time the best you can do is find a range (not the exact date-especially for the more modern ones). Take a look here:...
Original photos: 65...semi-pl but not quite enough for PL 66...cleaner than the first Updated photos: 63...cheek looks a lot more baggy...
A sample slab is an example of a slab that the grading companies would hand out to advertise their product. Most of these tend to feature...
It was in original packaging (slabbed in one of those Anacs/OSV cases which includes the entire original set-only one board was shown; these are...
Was it worth it to crack out of the Anacs mint set slab? I would think most of those coins would sell for less once outside of the original mint...
MS 64 ....a few hits on the cheek prevent a gem grade on an otherwise solid looking Buffalo
I gave it the benefit of doubt with a 66 but said not FS (gash under third column). I see that DGS was fairly conservative. Congrats on finally...
It depends on what you have. Sometimes getting the same grade more than covers the submission fees.
Got you twice :p
And the reveal....AU detail cleaned [ATTACH]
My strategy is to just look at the first post, make my determination, and post. Then go back and read other comments.
Separate names with a comma.
