Yup, Low MS, 62-63
Click here to go to my E-Bay Store [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] [IMG] Click here to go to my E-Bay Store
Well, the nicest unless you like toners. [IMG]
You are welcome! I sold all of mine, but this was the nicest one of group. [IMG]
How much can you really overpay for $25. The silver value alone is near $13 and an MS62 will garner some premium. I wouldn't worry about it.
That coin is better, doesn't look cleaned or polished, but still a rather meager grade, I give it MS62.
That coin has been polished. Good thing it is a common date and had very little numismatic value to start with.
Wasn't me, my post was from 2010. As for the coin, an NGC MS66 sells for $15-$20, mine is an MS67 which has an NGC population of 7/0.
OMG, my balls are being busted during a resurrection.
That is a nice looking nickel, MS67FS?
In fairness, mine is a D/S, it just isn't designated as such. There were 10 different dies that yielded the D/S mintmark with some being more...
My bad, I guess my head got stuck on the title of the thread. I thought we were talking about 55 Philly nickels. I really can't understand how I...
The NGC population in MS66 is 103/7, that is not common. Furthermore, just because you have some with a stronger strike than this one does not...
Although the very nature of that toning calls the originality into question, I don't care, it looks awesome!
I'm gonna have to start asking for slab generations in order to get some of these GTGs correct. That coin is an easy MS66 and I think it should...
No, that is actually a strong strike for that year. Crack that puppy and send it to NGC. If the luster is all there, which it looks like it is...
I like it at MS67. Regarding Full Bands, I need to know who graded it. PCGS: MS67FB NGC: MS67
The reason that they put the word "Silver" on the 1942-P is because in 1942, the Philadelphia mint produced nickels from both the standard nickel...
The quality of coins produced in 1955 was atrocious. This is one of the best I have ever seen. I'm going to say MS66, simply because it is...
65PL
Separate names with a comma.
