65 rd
large date sorry
the mint mark appears as if the top serif is pointed and that's a bad sign. I'd have it authenticated by someone in hand. The pics just don't...
Morgan, many pre-1970 proofs are completely brilliant and not frosted with cameo like modern proofs.
it' still not clear enough to tell. If you look at google images of genuine mint marks for a 16-D Mercury dime or a 21-D walking liberty...
I think that the true riches in coins come by way of enjoying the knowledge and the friendships.
66 rd
67 rd
ok... apart from the pictures giving me seizures because they're sideways... first impression - the mintmark looks like it's sitting in a...
hard to tell from those pics. My guess would have to be MS-66
there are far too many problems with this coin that are apparent at a glance. First, the color is wrong. 22K gold may tone, but this actually...
where is it marked?
ok, now you've seen what happens in this thread and it continues every time a similar thread starts... What I suggest is that you grade the...
this is an awesome thread!!! It belongs on the main page!!! :thumb:
the Mint has figured out how to legally make a profit and they are going to beat that horse to death until someone stops them
this coin was likely minted outside of the US by a private firm. The date is listed at 19.11.1969 which is a european convention rather than the...
XF, the coin looks nice, but the luster is all washed out. Maybe it has been harshly dipped, I'm not sure, but surfaces are better than the grade...
You know, Paul... I can't say I know for sure. I mean, you and I both see them on this coin and we also both said proof right out of the box. I...
those look to me to be plachet flaws that didn't strike out completely because they are on both sides of the coin in just the absolute highest...
MS-65 I really don't like those marks, though. Without them I might even say MS-66
Separate names with a comma.
