It is known as a filled die. This can be found on many coins and is considered a minor error. Since it is common and the filled area is small, it...
Which brings to question the moderation standards on CT. The Mustache Dude made it clear that this guy has done nothing wrong and shouldn't be...
You don't need to be a magician to see that the coin has been harshly cleaned and suffered significant damage from gouges and rim bruises. This...
This is not the original mint packaging. Someone put this together after the coins left the mint
Here is something the clickbait , "get rich from pocket change" YouTube hacks conveniently forget to tell you. 1964 SMS coins were found in the...
Well, I'm glad you were able to correct it here. I was familiar with the 32 sheet set up but hadn't paid any attention to the 50 note sheets...
Agree that it was a fairly common nickname for people named Richard that were born up through the 50's. Here is an NFL quarterback from the 60's...
Thanks. I'm not an expert on currency, but I pulled the pic directly from the USCurrency.gov site...
Well, even if my previous didn't answer your question, maybe others will find it useful. The letter/number indicates plate position. A1-H4 as...
Same die? Tough to tell, but I don't think so. The 1st coin has some chipping just below the lower loop of the B. The second coin with a bigger...
95999999 for recent notes. I think it was in the 60s that equipment/process changes resulted in this being the highest number (maybe one of the...
"...sufficient secondary choice"??? How can you say say this in with a straight face? If you would have done a little research on the test and...
Wrong. Reason #1 - the alleged test marks vary in diameter and depth. This much variability would cause the sample to be rejected Reason #2 -...
Maybe it's Sally Hemings ;)
@tommyc03 answered your question correctly. The marks are PMD
The last letter visible is the T in LIBERTY. The Y is missing due to the heavy corrosion. Sorry, but it isn't an error
Your coin was struck by worn dies. The radiating flow lines are a characteristic. Sorry, but it has no additional value.
#2 is not a die crack. If it’s raised, it may be glue or some other adhered material like @Heavymetal said and it is not an error. If it is...
Agree that none of the nickels could have left the mint looking like that. First has some type of melted metal adhered to it. The second looks...
Lamination/planchet defect. I don't see any indication of displaced metal that would normally be seen with a heavy scratch
Separate names with a comma.
